Your final paper will mimic all of the features of a publishable scholarly article, in abbreviated form. It should be about 20-22 double-spaced pages. I provided a copy of the notes for the instructions of the assignment as well as what I have written so far I need you to edit the introduction and all the other sections and write the remaining sections of the essay. Edit and revise what is already there I have written a majority of it but I am having trouble on the literature review and having it all make sense so I need help on that. Ignore the mentioning of “WAGS” in the copy of the notes that is someone else’s research paper topic. I also am providing examples of other research papers from the professors other classes. Focus on editing the literature review finish writing it and writing the textual analysis
Category: Business and Management : Communication Studies
Your final paper will mimic all of the features of a publishable scholarly article, in abbreviated form. It should be about 20-22 double-spaced pages. I provided a copy of the notes for the instructions of the assignment as well as what I have written so far I need you to edit the introduction and all the other sections and write the remaining sections of the essay. Edit and revise what is already there I have written a majority of it but I am having trouble on the literature review and having it all make sense so I need help on that. Ignore the mentioning of “WAGS” in the copy of the notes that is someone else’s research paper topic. I also am providing examples of other research papers from the professors other classes
Writing Your EssayThe analysis essay is a form of expository prose, a kind of writing in which you argue several points. The topic of your analysis is your critical response to the ideas in one of the articles. To begin, examine several or all essays attached to this assignment (Blacksher & Valles, Buchanan, DiAngelo, Tatum) and then decide on the one to which you will respond. Then, reread the chosen article several times, noting the thesis and the subpoints in the reading. You can also note aspects of style that affect the strengths and weaknesses in the article, and how well the article develops its main and subpoints. You may need to do additional research about each of the authors before you begin formulating your analysis. For example, learn more about DiAngelo’s arguments by researching other works by this author or by locating other sources on white fragility concept. You then need to formulate your critical response to the article. Consider whether you agree with the main point, the persuasiveness of the arguments, the arrangement of the subpoints (organization), clarity, the intellectual level of the writing, emotional and/or logical appeals, and the writing style. Then begin to outline your essay, deciding on your thesis, and the supporting subpoints you will develop. Consider also how you will organize your essay. It is usually best to begin with an introduction in which you seek the reader’s attention, state your thesis, and preview the subpoints. Then, develop your subpoints which will be the main the body of your essay. Finally, plan a conclusion that restates your thesis, reviews the subpoints (briefly), and ends with an effective closing. You will probably need to revise your outline several times, and keep going back to the article.Once you have a good outline, begin writing your essay. It is recommended that you write several drafts and take time between each one in order to effectively refine your essay. Although your audience is the professor in COM 332, consider that, overall, you are addressing a college educated reader. Strive for clear organization, clarity, and developing 2-3 subpoints in support of your thesis. You need to show whether you agree with the thesis in the article, and explain the basis for your agreement (or disagreement).Additional Research RequiredTo support your analysis, you must cite at least 2 scholarly sources. These have to be in addition to sources you read as part of the course. So citing course readings is strongly suggested but will not count towards the 2 source requirement.Grading CriteriaThe essays will be evaluated according to: 1) soundness of content (logic and reasoning in support of the thesis; development of main points; 2) clear organization (intro, body, conclusion; subpoints fully developed); 3) writing style (effective language, grammar, punctuation, and proper format in references) either MLA or APA are acceptable styles of referencing; and 4) use of sources (cited sources are credible and used fully, not just for one quote) ReferencesBlacksher, E., & Valles, S. A. (2021) White privilege, White poverty: Reckoning with class and race in America. Special Report: Democracy in Crisis (pp. S51-S57). Hastings Center Report.Buchanan, P. J. (2010). Deconstructing America. In G. Colombo, R. Cullen, & B. Lisle. (Eds.). Rereading America: Cultural contexts for critical thinking and writing (pp. 462-472). New York: St. Martin’s Press.DiAngelo, R. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 54-70.Tatum, B. D. (2004). Defining racism: Can we talk? In P. S. Rothenberg. (Ed.) Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (pp. 123-130). New York: Worth Publishers.
The first page at the top left-hand corner of the page is single-spaced:
First and last name
HSCI 3110
Instructor name
Date you completed the paper for submission (not the date you wish you had completed it)
Paragraph 1 is the Introduction: Describe the work situation using your name and a fake name for whoever you are working with to include these options; boss to employee, employee to employee, employee to customer, faculty member to student…getting the drift of the requirement? Describe your unmet needs, behaviors, etc.
Paragraph 2: (12.5 Step 2) Make a date and place to meet with the person you are having the issues with that is comfortable for both parties.
Paragraph 3: (12.5 Step 3) Describe your unmet needs (behavior, interpretation, feeling, consequences) without placing blame or becoming aggressive. Use the Assertive behaviors that you have learned in this course.
Paragraph 4: (12.5 Step 3A) Paraphrase or perception-check to get your point across without placing blame.
Paragraph 5 (12.5 Step 3B) Get your point across with a clear message using behavior, consequences, intention, etc.
Paragraph 6 (12.5 Step 4) Clarify your partner’s point of view. Paraphrase or perception check and be clear about your needs.
Paragraph 7 (12.5 Step 5) Negotiate a solution following a, b, c, d substeps. Hint: Final solution between the two of you is located in this paragraph.
Paragraph 8 Conclusion (Step 6): Follow-up in a couple of weeks to meet with this person again. Schedule an appointment. Did your hard work using win-win problem-solving work or not? Is there a need to go back and try again? Hopefully not!
References if needed
Finally, the Critique: Answer the 5 questions listed on the evaluation form for your entire performance and script in paragraph form.