FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS
This essay could be used as a blog post if you desire.
According to Kevin Lee, the ideal blog post is 1600 words in length that takes seven minutes to read. Lee’s data shows a range of reading time of four to nine minutes. https://buffer.com/library/the-ideal-length-of-everything-online-according-to-science/#:~:text=The%20ideal%20length%20of%20a%20blog%20post%20is%207%20minutes,be%20one%20that%20people%20read.Links to an external site.
Wes Foster agrees with Lee but points out that writing a 1600 word post every week is not a probable outcome for most people. Foster posits: “the most important factor of any blog post is to effectively balance reader time, value provided, and search engine context” (at the end of the webpage). https://www.wesfed.com/blog/ideal-blog-post-length-seo/Links to an external site.
For this assignment we will focus on author’s time and value provided. Two hours is allocated for this essay and presuming that you type at 25 words a minute you can type 750 words in 30 minutes. This allows 90 minutes to look up content in your assigned reading as well as the Internet and write a short essay. Should you wish to write more, in order to produce an ‘ideal’ blog post you may do so, but the minimum of 750 words can sufficiently demonstrate your expertise in the topic. Please note that 750 words is the minimum.
The topic for this essay is: Summarize the ethical principles in the APA Ethics Code concerning research with human participants.
Write in APA style but do not format in APA style — no title page, no abstract, type in single space, use citations, and show references at the end of the essay.
Category: Quantitative Research
I have already written most of the paper and provided you with the tables at the end of the ppaper.
PLEASE READ THE PAPER TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF MY RESEARCH
I ONLY NEED THE RESULTS AND CONCLUSION WRITTEN WHICH TABLES ARE GIVEN TO YOU
– if possible please calcualte the IQV and include it
Please cite the tables when you use information from them
DIRECTIONS FROM PROFESSOR:
Results (Point Value: 35)
v Univariate Analyses: Present and interpret frequency distributions and descriptive statistics.
Regarding descriptive statistics, discuss the appropriate measures of central tendency and
variability of your dependent, independent, and control variables (i.e. means, medians, modes,
minimum and maximum values, skewness, standard deviations, and IQVs). Describe if the
variables follow a bimodal, normal or skewed distribution. Describe box plots, histograms,
pie charts, and/or bar charts to illustrate the results (one graph per variable).
v Bivariate Analyses: Describe the results of cross-tabulations, comparison of means, and/or
measures of association. Report results of all relationships tested, including statistical
significance, direction, and strength of association (ie., weak, moderate, or strong
relationships).
v
Multivariate Analyses: Describe the results of your TWO-WAY ANOVA, including
4
differences between groups that are statistically significant. Discuss whether you reject or
did not reject all 3 null hypotheses. After reporting your results, interpret your findings by
offering thoughts about the reliability and validity of your findings, relating your findings to
existing studies, and/or noting the larger ramifications of your findings.
CONCLUSION:
v Present a short summary of your major findings and insights with regard to your original
research question and hypotheses. Where your hypothesis supported or rejected?
v How do those findings relate to past research? Do they confirm or contradict prior research?
v List the limitations of your study.
v Make suggestions for further research based on your findings, including relationships you
would have liked to have examined but didn’t get a chance to do.