Please post your outline here if you would like to do the term paper. Check the syllabus for the more details about the term paper. Here is some information from the syllabus:
To be eligible [to write a term paper], a student must first submit an outline by Tuesday, May 28 (you can turn it in earlier!). That outline must be approximately 150 to 250 words long, with an indication of at least three sources (e.g., Internet sites, books, court cases, newspaper stories) you have found and may use. The outline is not graded, but we usually acknowledge its receipt and often also write to the submitting student with advice on how to approach his/her paper and/or with a request that he/she revise his/her outline. One approach – BUT NOT THE ONLY APPROACH – is have your paper arise from, relate to, delve deeper into, or otherwise concern a real case or actual example discussed in the LSB text, in the Barron’s book, or in one or more of the class-related YouTube videos. Generally, it would be much better to choose a case or example that was not discussed at great length (e.g., for more than one or two paragraphs), because that gives more opportunity for you to do your own research and develop your own insights.
This is not the only approach. Generally, any law topic that is business related (very broadly defined) is acceptable. Do not write about any subject that is more pertinent to another course than to a law course, about a matter where you are focusing on a case or an event from earlier than 2012, or about a criminal law matter not related to business.
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE focusing on OLD FAMOUS CASES – E.G., ROE v. WADE, BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUC.
Category: Law
Attatched is the ruberick for the paper. i need it re written into a college level paper. I am willing to activly stay on standby to chat with you to get this paper to a bachelor level style.
Please find below (1) dissertation guidelines, a reminder of the deadline, and an example of a good dissertation. You’ll also find (2) some notes from the session as well as key sources.
1 – Dissertation guidelines
Re criteria of a good dissertation, the dissertation must be a substantial scholarly work of a quality and length akin to a law review article (at least 8 pages), that follows the below guidance:
Re the Introduction
· Please identify the dissertation subject and include a hook that captures the reader’s interest and articulates the scope of the dissertation.
· Please describe the overall argument.
· Please clarify fundamental concepts to the extent necessary.
· Please summarizes the paper’s structure in a roadmap.
Re the content, the student’s dissertation is evaluated on the basis of the following elements:
· Issue Statement : please identify a problem and provide a constructive analysis of it.
· Legal Significance : please present a subject that is novel, not obvious, and useful to the audience.
· Persuasive Argument: The argument in support of the thesis is clear, logical, and sustained throughout the document. Please make connections to broader related issues, without tangents or distractions (e.g., comparative law for instance between the UAE and EU where relevant).
· Balance : please offer a proposition and give sufficient weight to opposing views and countervailing considerations, by: taking problems and turning them to your advantage; addressing implications such as resources and policy matters; acknowledging tradeoffs as necessary.
· Structure: please structure the parts of your dissertation in a logical order; coherently connect sections and use transitions to effect good flow throughout.
Re the conclusion,
· Please re-state the thesis; provide insightful observations and conclusions (for example, by discussing the future implications of the dissertation or by providing forward looking recommendations); avoid introducing new, confusing information or propositions.
Re the format, I would appreciate you to follow this structure:
· Word-formatted
· Times New Roman (12 pt.)
· Double-spaced text
· 1.5 inches left margins
· 1 inch margins on the top, bottom, and right
· Footnotes with endnotes
· No blank pages
· Page numbering
Example of a good dissertation
Please find attached an example of a very good dissertation from the 2019 promotion. Deepa agreed for me to share her dissertation with the group.
2 – Key notes of the lecture are attached to this email as well.
3 – Some of you had difficulties to find the GDPR and Draft AI Regulation:
EU GDPR: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679
Leaked final version of the EU AI Act: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xfN5T8VChK8fSh3wUiYtRVOKIi9oIcAF/view
US Biden AI Executive Orders: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/
US OMB Guidance on AI: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2023/11/01/omb-releases-implementation-guidance-following-president-bidens-executive-order-on-artificial-intelligence/
I remain available should you have any question.
Many thanks in advance
Please answer the following in an proper essay format (with a clear introduction, body-mulitple paragraphys for the body is okay, and conclusion:
“A resulting trust can also arise even if the recipient is unaware of the transfer or of the circumstances in which it was made. Indeed, this is perhaps the commonest case.” Peter Millett, ‘Restitution and Constructive Trusts’ (1998) 114 LQR 399, 401
Critically evaluate the role that intention plays in the creation of resulting trusts.
INSTRUCTIONS:
-absolutely NO OUTSIDE SOURCES are to be used other than the ones provided
-no formal refercing is required, just a brief refernce to the source (e.g. in the textbook by “state authors name” or in the article titled “state article name”)
-IMPORTANT: please use UK case law and statutory acts to answer the question which can be found within the textbook materials and article provided
-SIDE NOTE: the file attached labelled Topic 1(1) pg 366-379 means you only need to include material in the answer from the pages 366-379
-provide counter position when required but come to a conclusion which is the best way to go
– Word count: 1900 words
-absolutely NO PLAGARISM OR AI SOURCES as this will be submitted through turnitin
Write an essay of 500 to 750 words to address the following: Define what it means to be a police officer and determine some of the duties of a police officer. Explain the legal use of nondeadly force and deadly force by the police. Determine based on research and statistical analysis whether American police officers use too little, enough or too much force. Describe the limits placed on police power by the U.S. Constitution and the federal courts. Are these limits appropriate given the current state of police use of force? Explain. Utilize the GCU library to locate a minimum of three to five scholarly, relevant sources to support your content.
Read the case and then answer the questions.
Bob is an artist who creates paintings inspired by popular movies and
TV shows. He sells his paintings on his website and at local art shows.
Recently, he painted a portrait of a character from a popular movie
franchise and began selling prints of the painting on his website. The
owner of the movie franchise, ABC Productions, sends Bob a cease and
desist letter claiming that the portrait infringes on their trademark
and copyright. Bob disagrees and argues that his painting is a
transformative work of art and is protected by fair use.
Discuss the legal issues at play in this scenario with respect to
trademark and copyright law. In your essay, consider the following
questions:
Does ABC Productions have a valid claim of trademark infringement
against Bob? What factors should be considered in this analysis?
Does ABC Productions have a valid claim of copyright infringement
against Bob? What factors should be considered in this analysis?
Can Bob argue that his painting is a transformative work of art and
is protected by fair use? What factors should be considered in this
analysis?
Are there any other legal or ethical issues at play in this scenario that should be considered?
In your essay, you should use relevant legal principles and cases to
support your analysis and conclusions. You should also consider the
policy considerations underlying trademark and copyright law and how
they may apply to this scenario.
Make sure to include the following:
Trademark defined completely, applied fully to case’s facts.
Full 8-part test shown and analyzed
Copyright defined completely, applied fully to case’s facts.
Full four-part fair use test defined, explained and applied
https://revisionlegal.com/trademark/trademarks/trademark-infringement-test/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lapp_test
Full topic:Addressing deep socio-economic inequality in a HRBAD: a bilateral governmental donor seeks to address structural socio-economic inequality within a least developed country (90 % of the wealth is
held by 10 % of the people), and wonders whether and how it can help to address deep inequality in
the partner country (with a particular focus on the HRBAD principle of non-discrimination).
1. Group 5 argues that the equality norm needs reinvigoration to address structural socio-
economic inequality, and suggests how such reinvigoration could take place in the context of
a HRBAD.
In the written assignment you have to develop an argument in favour or against a certain approach to an HRBAD, based on the briefing that you have received (same topic and position as for roundtable).
The paper will take the format of an internal policy brief rather than an academic piece.
The policy brief is a document which outlines the rationale for choosing a particular policy alternative or course of action in a current policy debate. It is commonly produced in response to a request directly from a decision-maker or within an organisation that intends to advocate for the position detailed in the brief. … Nevertheless for any case, as any policy debate is a market-place of competing ideas, the purpose of the policy brief is to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current problem and the need to adopt the preferred alternative or course of action outlined and therefore, serve as an impetus for action.
Source: http://www.policy.hu/ipf/fel-pubs/samples/PolicyBrief-described.pdf
add an executive summary of between 300 and 500 words
After a short introduction of the topic, develop the argument that has been assigned to you. Decide which focus you want to take; it is impossible to engage with all arguments.
Grab and keep the attention of the decision-maker; framing is important (normative versus effectiveness/impact arguments: ‘it is the right thing to do’ versus ‘it works’)
The argumentative analysis must engage with the key elements mentioned above (human rights principles; human rights law; power, change and context analysis; human rights law and global justice).
Stick to the position assigned to you (in favour or against), and be consistent in your arguments. Structure your text clearly.
Do not copy paste text from websites, articles, policy documents. Your submission is automatically submitted to a plagiarism check. Severe penalties for plagiarism apply.
Length: minimum 1500 words, maximum 2500 words (exclusive of cover page, executive summary and bibliography)
References: use APA (name, date, page number) in the text, and add a short bibliography;the bibliography is not included in the word count
Substantive orientation
attention must be paid to:
human rights principles
human rights law as it is and as it ought to be
aspects of power, change and context analysis
a combination of legal technical human rights analysis with global justice considerations
Keep the target audience (as mentioned in the themes section) in mind.
Question
Business Financing
Michael is a contractor who typically receives payment for his work via bank transfer. For his latest January 2024 project, the client accidentally issued a cheque instead. Upon inspection, Michael noticed the date written on the cheque was 1 June 2024 and contained several spelling mistakes in the company name. Additionally, the cheque was written in Malay language, but Michael is a German that does not understand Malay. On top of that, Michael noticed that the cheque was written using a combination of pencil, and purple coloured ink.
Use Bills of Exchange Act 1949 and decisions of previous cases to explain to Michael the validity of the cheque.
Business Competition
ChargeCo and PowerVolt are the two major companies that dominate the EV market. Both offer similar fast-charging stations and subscription plans for access. They operated individually and are not connected to each other.
In November 2023, both ChargeCo and PowerVolt simultaneously announced identical price increases for their subscriptions and in January 2024, they entered into an agreement on their market share. In the agreement, ChargeCo focuses on urban areas whereas and PowerVolt concentrates on rural locations, avoiding direct competition between one another.
Use Competition Act 2010 and decision of previous cases (from www.mycc.gov.my) to explain whether this conduct amounts to the prohibitions by Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC). Also explain the remedial action that MyCC can take if these conducts are found to be in breach of the Act.
Instructions
1. You are required to write in an essay format suitable for an academic report within the word limit of 2, 000 – 2,500 words.
2. Citation and references, as well as tables and appendices will not be considered as part of the word count.
3. References for answering the questions should include at least two (2) published journals, Bills of Exchange Act 1949, Competition Act 2010, and a minimal reference to internet resources.
4. Both in-text citation and general referencing using APA Referencing system must be adopted for this assignment.
5. Your essay must adhere to standard documentation requirements:
§ Font : Times New Roman
§ Font Size : 12
§ Spacing : 1.5
6. Please draw your attention to APU’s regulations on plagiarism; these regulations apply to this coursework. Any information taken from any source MUST be cited and referenced using the APA Referencing method. APU general referencing guide can be found on: https://library.apiit.edu.my/apa-referencing/
Assessment Criteria
This assessment will be marked based on the following criteria:-
CONTENT: Clarity and flow of information and the ability to consider the legal issues within the constraints of the word limit
40%
RESEARCH: Good and balanced research towards critical evaluation rather than plain description. Appropriate and different sources must be reviewed, focusing on academic research and not just secondary research from URLs.
20%
LITERATURE REVIEW: Comprehensive review of the selected texts and the ability to support views presented with proper reasoning
20%
REFERENCING AND CITATION: Use of APA Referencing method to identify the source(s) of information.
10%
OVERALL STRUCTURE: Use of proper language and grammar; work must be type-written, neat and presentable
10%
TOTAL
100%
This is the assignment with 2 legislations. The topic needs to be on domestic abuse. The previous writer added domestic violence. I will attach the comments from
The previous assignment too
To review the assignment information, click on the document name to view or download the document. Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.
Proposal Classical Argument Thesis/Outline Assignment Instructions
Proposal Classical Argument Thesis/Outline Resources
Antecedents of Cybersecurity Implementation: A Study of the Cyber-Preparedness of U.K. Social Enterprises
Artificial Intelligence Implementation to Counteract Cybercrimes Against Children in Pakistan
Artificial Intelligence and Human Psychology in Online Transaction Fraud
Cyber Victimisation, Restorative Justice and Victim-Offender Panels
An Integrated Cybernetic Awareness Strategy to Assess Cybersecurity Attitudes and Behaviours in School Context
Cybersecurity Awareness and Training (CAT) Framework for Remote Working Employees
Exploring the social implications of buying and selling cyber security
Generational Inclusion: Getting Older Adults Ready to Own Safe Online Identities
Impact, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigation Strategies for Cyber-Secure Critical Infrastructure
Is there a cybercriminal personality? Comparing cyber offenders and offline offenders on HEXACO personality domains and their underlying facets
Mapping Cyber-Enabled Crime: Understanding Police Investigations and Prosecutions of Cyberstalking
Thwarting Instant Messaging Phishing Attacks: The Role of Self-Efficacy and the Mediating Effect of Attitude towards Online Sharing of Personal Information
Unpacking the political-criminal nexus in state-cybercrimes: a macro-level typology
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. For more information about Turnitin, click here.
Chapter 13 is in attachments