This quantitative study uses the CUSE (Computer User Self-Efficacy Scale) to determine the effects of digital literacy programs on the self-efficacy of senior citizens. The literature review must be at least 40 pages, but I really just need something to get me going that I can use as an example and edit/add to.
Some headings to use:
The Digital Divide
Digital Inclusion
Digital Skills in the Modern Workforce
Technology barriers for older adults in the workforce
Senior Citizens Technology Use
Difference in men & women computer self-efficacy
Improving the lives of senior citizens through technology
Self-Efficacy
Measuring Self-Efficacy
Some resources are attached as a Word doc that can be used, but not limited to.
Category: Study design
This study uses the CUSE (Computer User Self-Efficacy Scale) to determine the effects of digital literacy programs on the self-efficacy of senior citizens. The literature review must be at least 40 pages, but I really just need something to get me going that I can use as an example and edit/add to.
Some headings to use:
The Digital Divide
Digital Inclusion
Digital Skills in the Modern Workforce
Technology barriers for older adults in the workforce
Senior Citizens Technology Use
Difference in men & women computer self-efficacy
Improving the lives of senior citizens through technology
Self-Efficacy
Measuring Self-Efficacy
*** JASP REQUIRED
Overview
For this assignment, you’ll practice what you’ve learned over the past 2 weeks. You’ll also begin working toward your final assignment in Week 9.
Preparation
Before you begin the assignment, complete the following:
Download the Thinking About Your Data worksheet (attached, doc 1).
Review your Week 4: Assignment PreparationLinks to an external site. reading list(see below)
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1841556332?parentSessionId=nRxRTyxirqip8i7TVWgUrUIySkCrLO0b3nCBIKH%2BQ98%3D&pq-origsite=&accountid=27965&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
https://hrmars.com/index.php/IJARBSS/article/view/27/Sampling-Design-Validity-and-Reliability-in-General-Social-Survey
https://gss.norc.org/Get-Documentation
Instructions
Complete and submit the Thinking About Your Data worksheet.
Tips for success:
Do each step one at a time. Running statistical tests requires paying attention to details.
Pay special attention to which data file to use—you’ll use several of them.
Keep JASP, your textbook, and Statistical Analysis in JASP: A Guide for StudentsLinks to an external site. open when working on your worksheet.
Read, don’t skim, each part of the worksheet. The text will often help you find the answer.
Do the entire worksheet (it’s long).
When you are done, scroll to the very end of the document. Then scroll up slowly to double-check that you have an answer in each box. Going in reverse (from the end to the beginning) is often the best way to spot something you overlooked earlier.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Interpret complex statistical findings and graphs in the context of their level of statistical significance, including the influence of effect size.
Interpret the results of a t-test on the variables sex and wwwhr.
Interpret the results of a Mann-Whitney test.
Competency 2: Apply statistical analyses to problems in the social sciences.
Perform a t-test on the variables sex and wwwhr.
Perform a t-test on the variables raclive and mntlhlth.
Describe t-tests.
Perform a Mann-Whitney on the variables raclive and happy.
Perform a Mann-Whitney on the variables raclive and life.
Perform a Mann-Whitney on the variables news and depress.
Describe Mann-Whitney.
Determine whether a t-test or Mann-Whitney can be used for the study.
Competency 3: Determine the generalizability of specific findings based on parameters of the research design.
Determine the generalizability of specific findings based on parameters of the research design.
Competency 5: Determine the reliability and validity of measures and research design.
Determine the reliability and validity of measures.
Competency 6: Communicate quantitative data in statistics, graphs, tables, and in common language.
Communicate statistical information in academic language.
Communicate statistical information about a Mann-Whitney in common language.
Communicate Mann-Whitney results in academic language.
*** let me know if you have any questions.
استخدام التقنية اللوح التفاعلي الذكي في تعزيز استراتيجية المعلم الصغير لدراسة الأشكال ثلاثية الأبعاد ضمن منهاج الرياضيات في الأردن
INSTRUCTIONS
Please organize your article memo so that it compliant to the four point structure displayed
below. Also, make that the article memo adheres to proper APA citation rule. I will not grade
non-complaint assignments./You will be asked to write a 2-3 page memo assessing the findings of an article that we covered
over the semester for the course, or recent (if article is not from our course, it should be within
the last 10 years) program evaluation study discussed in an academic journal.
The memo should consist of a concise summary and critique of a study. Your analysis should be based solely on the
description in the journal article.
The memo will have four sections:
/i. study aims/– What are the objectives of the the program reported on?
— Who are the stakeholders?
— Is the evaluation summative or formative?
/ii. study design/– What is the study design?
— Assuming a summative evaluation, does the program affect all or part of the population?
/iii. study findings/– How were the effects of the program measured?
/iv. critique.//
— Is the purported study design optimum or most feasible? Why?
The first three sections should be very short (half a page to a page). The majority of the memo
should focus on the weaknesses of the study. The memo must be APA citation compliant. If you
choose an article outside of the course then you need my permission to use that article and a
copy of the outside article must be also be submitted with the memo.
/
The course articles that you could review are:
Campbell and Ross (1968)
Sherman and Berk (1984)
Krueger (1999)
Angrist (2006)
Carpenter and Dobkin (2011)
This is an article memo !!!!!