Please use basic words and do not overcomplicate this assignment. I uploaded documents of how I type of the internship I took including theories and frameworks. Please be sure to keep your word use similar to mine.
Use this textbook as one of the sources.
“bookshelf.vitalsource”
Username: *************************************** Password12345!
Use scholarly articles to clarify the theories I saw
Category: Criminology
Choose one of the genetic theories in chapter 2 and briefly summarize.
Read the NCBI Chapter on Etiology – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232972/Links to an external site. and explain how this supplemented your knowledge on etiology of substance use beyond Chapter 4 of our textbook.
In preparation for a court appearance, the federal law enforcement agency wants to ensure proper forensic processes and techniques are used in a computer crime case involving identify theft.
When challenging the admissibility of the digital evidence, the defense examiner will evaluate the authentication and chain of custody techniques used. The federal law enforcement agency would like your company, AB Investigative Services (ABIS), to identify in a report the possible authentication and chain of custody techniques acceptable in the investigative process, including issues relating to First and Fourth Amendment privacy issues with respect to computer-related technologies.
Begin the report with a one-page overview of the forensics process and the steps taken by an examiner related to identity theft and computer crime.
Provide 2–3 pages identifying the following:
2 recommended examples of authentication acceptable in the investigative process of identity theft
2 recommended examples of chain of custody techniques of digital evidence
Provide 2–3 pages explaining the following:
What is considered legal or illegal under the guidelines of the First and Fourth Amendments in relation to the identity theft investigation
Cite your sources using APA style.
Must have title, Introduction, Conclusion and References
Budget Process Memo
Financial analysts guide governments and security entities in decisions about the budgeting process. Imagine being a financial analyst for the Los Angeles Police Department
STEP 1: Write a 200 word MEMORANDM to a new incoming group of legislators to describe the budget process. If you are unfamiliar with the MEMORANDUM template- please review this site: Sample Memorandum.
(https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/professional_technical_writing/memos/sample_memo.html)
STEP 2: Include the following in your memo:
An opening statement indicating your position and the purpose of this memorandum
A description of the steps of the budget process, including when the fiscal year begins and ends
The timeline and key milestones of the budget process, from budget submission by agencies/departments to the final budget
A closing statement with any follow-up or contact information for the new legislators.
***Please remember that this is not a formal paper but a Memorandum
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 1 Correctional Aims and Correctional Systems from the textbook. Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from any required material or other scholarly resources and properly cite any references.
In this discussion,
Examine the pros and cons from four of six major correctional aims or goals of sentencing from your Stojkovic and Lovell (2019) textbook.
Compare and contrast at least one function of a historical correctional system with at least one function of a contemporary correctional system.
Describe correctional system functions that relate to (select at least one)
punishment,
rehabilitation, treatment, or
supervision
Deliverable: Two- to three-page (not including the cover or reference pages) APA-formatted paper (100 points)
In this assignment, you will research and discuss the pros and cons of using the death penalty over life imprisonment. You must support your opinions and evaluations with information, data, or statistics. You must also incorporate theory into your discussion (see the Week 3 assigned reading).
Follow these steps to complete your assignment.
Begin your research.
Research the use of the death penalty.
Research the use of life imprisonment for capital cases.
Review your assigned chapter reading on rational choice and trait theories and the assigned article. Conduct additional research as needed.
Write your paper.
Cover page
Body of the paper:
Introduction: Provide an introductory paragraph.
Purpose of the death penalty: Why do some states use the death penalty over life in prison? This section should be at least one full paragraph.
Apply theory: This section should be three or more full paragraphs.
Are criminals rational decision makers, or are they motivated by uncontrollable biosocial, psychological, and emotional drives? Fully explain.
Considering what you learned regarding trait theories, what role should this information play (if any) in sentencing? Fully explain your position and give examples.
Position: Based on your findings, are you for or against the death penalty? If so, for what crimes and when? If not, why? Explain your position based on your research findings. This section should be at least one full paragraph.
Conclusion: Wrap up your paper with a concluding paragraph.
Reference page: Include APA-formatted citations.
The paper should be in essay form. An essay is a composition that is intended to be an analytical, interpretative, original response about the topics and examples in question. An appropriate response should fully answer all questions. It should be organized, have a purpose, and contain examples to support the purpose. Each essay response should be edited for grammar, spelling, typos, and correct punctuation. The writing style should demonstrate an understanding of the material assigned and integrate multiple points of view, using vocabulary reflective of the topics discussed over the course of the week.
Introduction
There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the United States on the state and federal level. Each jurisdiction can have its own set of laws, including rules of evidence and procedure that govern how an individual’s rights are protected. A defendant may receive greater protections in one state jurisdiction than in another. During our review of the material, in the book, understand that often you’re learning about federal law or common law. However, Florida law mirrors federal law very closely. For example, the Federal Rules of Evidence and Florida Rules of Evidence are nearly identical substantively and are even numbered similarly. Florida simply adds a “90” in front of its rules of evidence. Federal Rule of Evidence 403 is 90.403 in Florida. As we learn more about the different laws that govern criminal procedure feel comfortable that your knowledge will be easily applied to any Florida scenario. Unless specified, please use Florida law when answering your assignments.
Case
Read the case of Hiibel vs. Sixth Judicial Court of Nevada, in Chapter 4, page 134, of your book; Reference the full Hiibel case for the 5th amendmentLinks to an external site.. Is the “Stop and Identify” Law Reasonable?
Directions
Each FRCP assignment is an opportunity for you to explore and learn more about the rules of procedure for Florida. The rules of procedure are extensive, but once you learn to navigate them they will provide answers to most criminal procedure questions a person may encounter. You will apply the rules of procedure that are relevant to the legal scenario in your book. To complete your FRCP Assignment, you must:
Identify two rules of procedure that apply to the legal issues discussed in the case;
Summarize the meaning of two rules, including the relevant subsections;
Explain why you think the rules apply to the legal issues in the case (support your opinion by citing specific references to the language in the case);
Don’t forget to address both the 4th and 5th amendment.
Format
Please use the following format for the FRCP Assignment:
Use APA format and cite sources, as necessary. If you need a refresher on APA, reference the APA Learning Unit. Do your resources meet the CRAAP test? Review CRAAP Test Reference page for more information.
Your answer must be a minimum of three (3) paragraphs of five (5) to seven (7) sentences.
Use Times New Roman, 12-point font, and double spaced.
All FRCP Assignments should be submitted in PDF format.
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Humboldt County | Oyez
A critical analysis of the relationship of Refugee Crisis to crime, harm and the state’.
· critically analyse the refugee crisis with crime, harm and the state, by drawing on one or more of the themes of power, discourse and resistance.
· use at least five sources, need to be a peer review journal article
· use please information from the attached document.
Great start – you need to review my comments and to cite more often. At the beginning of a paragraph is good but when you make statements you should do it at the end as well so you make sure that you have given full credit to the author
References need to be formatted in APA 7th edition
Review of the Literature (ROL)
Identify 10 scholarly resources related to the research question you chose in Module One.
These need to be peer-reviewed articles and text, not websites, Wikipedia posts, general web articles, news articles, blogs, and so forth.
You selected five resources for your Module One discussion, and feedback was provided by your instructor on the appropriateness of the article or resource. You may use the five approved resources from Module One as part of your 10 required resources for this assignment.
Craft an analysis of the resources that highlights the key points and problems that relate to the research question.
Things to note when conducting an analysis of resources:
Review individual resources for key points and problems that relate to the research question you chose. This should be one fluid writing, not a list of summarized articles.
You are analyzing the resources in order to identify recurring themes that are common to the research question topic.
State facts, not your personal opinion—there are no absolutes (e.g., research indicates…, research suggests…).
Questions to consider to develop a thorough analysis:
How did the problem evolve (if it can be determined)?
What is the current status of the problem?
What have criminal justice professionals done in the past to address the problem, and what do they currently do?
Identification of Problem
Identify a specific criminal justice problem based on your ROL.
Identify a factor that contributes to the problem.