Each student will then conduct an assessment of the agency
and community where their field placement is located. Based on the assessment,
the student will propose a macro-level intervention to address the selected
grand challenge. The intervention will not be implemented; however, the student
will submit an implementation plan. Utilize the resources available on
the https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/develop-a-plan/examples and the https://grandchallengesforsocialwork.org/#the-challenges websites
to help you in conducting your assessment. Each student will interview at least 6 people with knowledge of the
agency and community.
The individual portion of
the project: Each student will write a 13 PAGE double-spaced
paper which includes the following information.
1. Agency
context (3-4 double-spaced pages):
1. What is
the agency’s mission?
2. What
does the agency do?
3. Who
does the agency serve?
4. How
does the agency operate? Governance, culture, relevant policies
5. How is
the agency funded? What are the restrictions of the funding?
6. What is
the experience of the grand challenge for the agency stakeholders?
7. How
does the selected grand challenge impact the agency context? What does the
agency do to address any aspects of the grand challenge?
2. Community
context (3-4 double-spaced pages):
1. History
of the community?
2. Demographics
of the community? Include statistics and specific demographic information
related to the selected grand challenge
3. How
does the community operate? Governance, culture, relevant policies
4. What is
the experience of the grand challenge for the community stakeholders?
5. How
does the selected grand challenge impact the community context? What does the
community do to address any aspects of the grand challenge?
3. Proposed
intervention (3-4 double-spaced pages):
1. What
macro level evidence-based intervention will address a portion of the selected
grand challenge? The intervention selected reflects best practice. You may not
hire someone as your intervention.
2. How
does the proposed intervention address a portion of the grand challenge?
3. How
does the proposed intervention advance human rights and/or social, economic,
environmental, or racial justice?
4. How
will the proposed intervention work?
5. How
will the proposed intervention be implemented?
6. How
will the proposed intervention be funded? Identify specific grants to apply to
if more funding is needed. If using fundraising, how will the funding be
sustained when fundraising falls short? Include a specific and realistic budget
needed to implement the intervention
4. SWOT
analysis (2-3 double-spaced pages): This section includes
your assessment of the agency’s and community’s strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats related to the intervention. You can provide a
bulleted list for each category and then provide an explanation of each area of
the SWOT analysis.
5. Evaluate
the feasibility of the proposed intervention (2-3 double-spaced pages): This
section includes an analysis of the feasibility of implementing the proposed
intervention. Include an explanation of those who will support the intervention
and those who will be opposed to the proposed intervention. Include an
explanation of the tactics you will use to try to persuade the opposition to
support the proposed intervention.
6. References:
You will interview at least 6 people with knowledge of the agency and
community. You will need to cite at least 10 other credible sources of
information in your paper. All references and citations are in APA format.
I have attached all the
information required to complete this paper. Each attachment has been labeled
with the pieces of information required to complete the paper. Also, FYI, since
this paper relates to “The Grand Challenge” Paper I had previously submitted to
my professor, please make sure to read it and use as much information as needed
from it as well. Below find the most important piece of this paper I would like
you to use and elaborate on this. Feel free to ask me anything you need through
chat. Thank you.
“MY PROPOSED
INTERVENTION IS TO PROVIDE MILEAGE
REIMBURSEMENT AS AN INCENTIVE SO
THAT THERAPISTS CAN CONDUCT SERVICES TO YOUTH IN THEIR HOMES, IN PERSON INSTEAD
OF VIRTUAL SESSIONS TO ENSURE A MORE SECURE HEALTHY, WELL-BEING DEVELOPMENT OF
YOUTHS”. Therefore, providing in-home clinicians with mileage reimbursement as
an incentive will contribute to being more likely to service kids within their
homes instead of virtual. This possibility will benefit youth who constantly
have a lack of attention, shorter attention spam, example ADHD.