Week 3 Discussion
Epilepsy
LS is a 31-year-old woman who presents after a first-time seizure. The patient recalls experiencing an unusual rising sensation in the abdomen accompanied by an unpleasant, brief, metallic taste before losing awareness. Bystanders observed her to develop leftward head turning followed by stiffening and rhythmic jerking of her limbs. She appeared disoriented for 15 minutes following the event but steadily recovered to baseline functioning.
Past Medical History
Febrile convulsion in childhood following pneumonia at the age of 10
No birth-related or developmental complications Medications
Fluoxetine, 40 mg once daily Family History
Uncle with alcohol-associated withdrawal seizures
Labs
Electrolytes: Normal
Blood glucose level: Normal
Urine toxicology screening: Negative
Discussion Questions
1. What is an important risk factor that might have contributed to LS’s epilepsy?
2. Initial workup reveals normal electrolytes, normal blood glucose level, and negative urine toxicology screening. Which diagnostic studies should be obtained to further understand the risk of recurrent unprovoked seizures?
3. An EEG is obtained and shows epileptiform discharges over the right temporal head region. What is the best next course of action in terms of antiseizure therapy?
The post must be using at least 2 evidenced-based, peer-reviewed references no older than 5 years. All posts must be referenced as mentioned above and written in APA 7th edition format. A min of 250 words.
Category: Science
A. Beginning at the surface, compute the parcel temperatures and parcel dew point temperatures of each level. Place these values where question marks initially reside. B. Calculate the condensation level (if any).
C. Calculate where the parcel temperature exceeds the environmental temperature (if any).
D. Note the weather or geographical feature in the area provided in your tab under “Lifting in the environment”. Then answer all questions in part D.
This is Milestone one of a multiple-part project. I have included the entire project for context. Here is the assignment:
Write a report detailing the underlying geology of the project site. Using the cross-section, topographic map, and soil profile for your final project, be sure to fully explain any geologic features present and include elements relative to the formation of those features by addressing the critical elements below. Also, detail how you derived each of your conclusions. Lastly, discuss how the base geology might relate to the proposed surface development. The materials needed for this milestone can be found in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course:
Final Project Stratigraphy and Cross Section
Final Project Soil Profiles
Final Project Site Topographic Map
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Rock Stratigraphy: List the various rock types, in order, from the surface (A) downward. Identify subtypes (detrital, extrusive, etc.) of each rock layer.
Relative Dating: Detail which rock types are the oldest/youngest in the sequence. Detail how you derived your conclusions.
Geologic Features: Identify any present geologic features (faults, folds, etc.). Detail each and infer how these features formed within this environment.
Depositional Analysis: Infer the environmental conditions present during the deposition of each sedimentary layer.
Soils: Using the soil profile and the topographic map, what can you detail about the potential for erosion across the cross section? What leads you to this conclusion?
Surface Impacts: Provide a quick analysis of how the underlying geology might impact an overlying neighborhood.
What to Submit
Your paper must be submitted as a one- to two-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources, which must be cited in APA format.
I have attached the requirement for this prestnantion also another file been attached of how the template(theme) colors and fonts along with school logo should be .
please follow the requirements asked in attached file and the theme .
importance of Risk management implementation in hospitality projects
*Article word count: 600 words (maximum)
*Commitment to scientific integrity and *scientific research controls: writing order, references, documentation, and sources of information
*Ensure that the article is free of spelling and linguistic errors.
*Avoid plagiarism.
Project report with examples and pictures of companies and source
o what extent are healthcare services in your area [to be more specific in your ZIP CODE] providing telehealth and remote monitoring options and does this benefit the patient population?
Please let at least 3 examples where you were able to research thin in your neighborhood.
Zip code is Miami fl 331774 apa cutations
Instructions will be uploaded later.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)
I would like a review / proposal on the following:
– Immune cell (PBMC / PMN) separation from whole blood
– Immune cell (PBMC / PMN) stimulation by incubating these cells with post-exercise serum / plasma. It *must* specifically be autologous incubation.
If you need more specifics, the goal here is incubating pre-exercise immune cells with post-exercise serum / plasma which are more rich in pro-inflammatory cytokines.
There is no format requirement, but please keep it relatively “clean”
Imagine you are an elementary science teacher. Your principal has asked all teachers in your school to reflect on your teaching and professional development.
Create a 1,050- to 1,225-word professional growth plan.
Identify areas of personal strength and development concerning science content and teaching methods.
Describe your selected professional growth areas of focus, as well as information from your self-reflections that support your selections.
Research available resources to help you grow in these areas.
Consider the following:
How might your weak areas impact student learning? What do you plan to do to address these areas of weakness? How will growth improve your practice and enhance student learning?
What specific resources are available to help you with your growth?
Create a list of specific activities you could engage in to develop your areas of focus. Consider both activities that focus on acquiring content knowledge as well as developing skills.
Describe how you will know that you have achieved your goals. Provide a descriiption of the evidence you will collect and include a timeline for achieving the goals.
This will be an assignment for my doctoral health and human performance concentration: This is a revision of my comprehensive exam and the revision requests are provided in the files section, along with the original document needed to be revised. Please make sure to fully review the provided rubric. The areas that have not received proficient must be fully revised to meet the specified criteria. Also, the provided revision requests must be fully acknowledged and fixed throughout the paper. This for my comprehensive exam and involves developing a research proposal that focuses on the effects of resistance training on muscle hypertrophy in older adults with sarcopenia. The specific prompt and instructions are provided in the files section, along with a rubric explaining expectations for satisfactory work. Use current and relevant research as well as readings drawn from your course of study, with a focus placed on original research from peer-reviewed scientific journals. Provide proper within-text citations and a list of references as a separate page(s) after your response. All content must be formatted according to the 7th edition APA manual. A proficient discussion must include integrative writing, clear inclusion of mechanistic rationale for the findings you present, and the representation of data. At least 10 original intervention-based research studies must be actively reviewed within the body of your narrative to count towards the minimum resource requirement. All resource material must be from scholarly, empirically based, peer-reviewed sources that involve original research studies (not reviews) related to your topic of interest. If you include sources that are review articles, be advised they do not count towards the 10-article minimum. This narrative must offer a scholarly integration of information, not simply a summary, list or annotated bibliography of what has been done. Synthesize common threads in the existing research related to the specified topic. Identify patterns in the literature gaps, and future directions. Integration requires some compare/contrast across studies. Remember this study has not been done. You are to frame your response as a proposal. Do not make up data or conclusions. Textbooks, blogs, magazine or internet articles, book chapters, or special reports, do not count toward the peer-reviewed minimum. Connections to the peer reviewed references should be used throughout your writing with in-text citations and matching reference citations. For the literature review, make sure to write it as a cohesive, synthesis of themes. This should not be a summary of the articles. Please refer to this link for how to complete this: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/research_overview/synthesizing_sources.html
Please read carefully the questions being asked. Be sure to address them rather than the questions you prefer to address.
· Rubrics are your best friends; they should guide the organization, structure, content, and quality of this work.
· Proofread your document to catch typos and errors. You don’t want this paper to appear unprofessional.
· Cross-reference the entire document – references in the text and the reference list must match.