Write an article using at least 2 of these references following APA 7 , use in text citation,
–2 line spacing.
Using the Extended Parallel Process Model to Frame E Professionalism Instruction in Healthcare Education.pdf
facebook-refcheck-e.pdf
Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital marketing: Strategy, implementation, and practice. https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=- 1yGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT17&dq=%E2%80%A2%09Chaffey,+D.,+%26+Ellis-Chadwick,+F.+(2019).+Digital+marketing:+Strategy,+implementation,+and+practice.+Pearson+UK.&ots=XiYn8UoI05&sig=wnrVYQ9ao3pcUD0IVbZL5M1Cs0M#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and
opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0007681309001232#preview-section-cited-by
Kaczmarczyk, J. M., Chuang, A., Dugoff, L., Abbott, J. F., Cullimore, A. J., Dalrymple, J., & Casey, P. M. (2013). EProfessionalism: A new frontier in medical education.
Teaching & Learning in Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23530680
Kendra Gagnon , Carla Sabus. (2015). Professionalism in a Digital Age: Opportunities and
Considerations for Using Social Media in Health Care. Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Journal Volume 95. Pages 406–414, https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130227
The University of Edinburgh. e-Professionalism .(2016). https://www.ed.ac.uk/institute-academic-development/about- us/projects/digital-footprint/eprofessionalism
Grading criteria
Rubric
Discussion of social media platform
Detailed, academic discussion of topic
10 points
Ideas and opinions discussed in an organized manner
8.5 points
Basic discussion of topic
7 points
Lack of discussion, ideas or opinions
4 points
Critical Analysis and reflection
Insightful critical analysis and reflection utilized throughout
10 points
Critical analysis and reflection established
8.5 points
Critical analysis and reflection mentioned
7 points
No reflection mentioned
4 points
Organization of paper
Well written, using scholarly language
10 points
Paper is orderly and formatted appropriately
8.5 points
Paper is readable with minor structural errors
7 points
Paper is unorganized, difficult to read, lacking in appropriate structure
4 points
Structure of paper
No spelling, grammar, punctuation, or APA errors
10 points
One or two errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or APA format
8.5 points
Three or four errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or APA format
7 points
Five or more errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or APA format
4 points
◄